Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libffi - High level programming interface to various calling conventions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431633 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203@xxxxxxxxxx 2008-02-14 10:21 EST ------- (In reply to comment #17) > I agree with Anthony: libffi has never been part of gcc. > > I agree with Anthony: libffi is not a part of gcc, and never has been. I think you should communicate these claims to the GCS and the FSF. > 1. We need to decouple the release cycle of libffi from that of gcc. > Having to ask jakub to rebuild the whole gcc package for a small > libffi change is a big nuisance. > > 2. jakub has made it plain that he doesn't want to build a libffi > sub-package of gcc. This is the point: Redhat has decided to fork. May I ask Jacub to split out libiberty? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review