Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: authd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225294 ------- Additional Comments From jsafrane@xxxxxxxxxx 2008-02-13 05:02 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > rpmlint on srpm: > > authd.src:7: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes pidentd Fixed > authd.src:18: W: prereq-use xinetd Fixed > authd.src: W: no-url-tag See below > authd.i386: E: non-readable /etc/ident.key 0640 That's an intention, it's secret password. > authd.i386: E: zero-length /etc/ident.key That's an intention, it's zero-length secret password. > authd.i386: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/ident.key That's an intention, do not overwrite the password. > These are OK. > authd.i386: W: dangerous-command-in-%post chown > Fix if possible, might want to use the full path to chown. Chown is needed, and there *is* full path to /bin/chown. > In addition to needing a URL tag, the Source tag needs a url pointing to the > upstream tarball. If Fedora or RH are upstream, get a space on hosted. I did not find any upstream of authd, did I miss something? If there is not any, I'll go to fedorahosted.org > License tag should be GPLv2+. Fixed > Error in rawhide mock build: Fixed > Other than that, looks good, no other blockers. Thanks for the review! After the fixes (authd-1.4.3-14.rpm), rpmlint complains about: authd.i386: E: non-readable /etc/ident.key 0640 authd.i386: E: zero-length /etc/ident.key authd.i386: W: no-url-tag authd.i386: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/ident.key authd.i386: W: dangerous-command-in-%post chown authd.src: W: no-url-tag authd-debuginfo.i386: W: no-url-tag All these errors except url are described above. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review