Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: publican-fedora - Fedora Publishing Theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427482 ------- Additional Comments From kwade@xxxxxxxxxx 2008-02-13 03:34 EST ------- (In reply to comment #11) > (In reply to comment #10) > > rpmlint says: > > publican-fedora.src: W: invalid-license Open Publication License > > > > The Fedora short license name is "Open Publication": see > > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing#head-7c329132fff48be993272795da69b49c7812e8a9 > > Fixed. The legal notice specifies " ... Open Publication License, V1.0 or later ..." My understanding from Red Hat Legal (discussion with Mark Webbink) is that we don't want to use the "or later" language because we don't want to commit to using something that doesn't even exist yet. I'm not sure if this matters. That can exist in the toolchain and not be the same in the doc itself, right? As upstream you have a range of licensing decisions you can make, but since it's actually RHT as the upstream, I recommend this more conservative language. If you like, you can swipe the lingo directly from the Fedora Docs legal notice: http://docs.fedoraproject.org/release-notes/f8/en_US/legalnotice.html http://docs.fedoraproject.org/release-notes/f8/en_US/sn-legalnotice.html The first is a pointer with set-up, so the set-up lingo matches what the main legal notice page has. The wording on the sn-legalnotice.html is directly from the OPL; the rest is a modified grandchild of the legal notice that used to be in RHEL docs, inherited through the original Fedora days. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review