Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: publican-fedora - Fedora Publishing Theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427482 petersen@xxxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kwade@xxxxxxxxxx ------- Additional Comments From petersen@xxxxxxxxxx 2008-02-12 21:12 EST ------- rpmlint says: publican-fedora.src:16: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes documentation-devel-Fedora This is ok, but probably it can be dropped assuming there aren't many people using the old package. publican-fedora.src: W: invalid-license Open Publication License The Fedora short license name is "Open Publication": see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing#head-7c329132fff48be993272795da69b49c7812e8a9 A few comments: publican-0.29/Book_Template/en-US/ and publican-fedora-0.8/Book_Template/en-US are the same, but presumably they are duplicated because they are under different licenses, right? The README file says "for building Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux documentation". It would be valuable to get comments on this package from the Fedora Docs project since I am not really qualified to evaluate the templates, etc. Otherwise the package basically looks ok to me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review