[Bug 431181] Review Request: libitl - Libraries for The Islamic Tools and Libraries Project

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: libitl - Libraries for The Islamic Tools and Libraries Project


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431181


tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEEDINFO                    |ASSIGNED
               Flag|fedora-review?,             |fedora-review+
                   |needinfo?(tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx)|




------- Additional Comments From tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx  2008-02-11 15:24 EST -------
Aargh, setting needinfo made this drop out of my TODO list and I missed it when
I was going over my tickets this weekend.  I really wish needinfo worked better.

Anyway, the new package looks better, but there's a problem with the avoidance
of autoconf.

First off, if you're going to provide a built configure file, please just supply
it as Souce1: instead of patching it in.  A patch that does nothing more than
add a source file is rather strange.

But honestly, I'm not really sure that patching in the configure file is any
better than just generating it.  It has the benefit of not requiring the
autotools and not being dependent on the specific autotools versions that might
be installed on each release you're building on, so I guess it's no worse. 
Frankly I'm not really sure which is the right thing to do, but I've held this
ticket up long enough thinking about the issue.

So I'll go ahead and approve this, but please move the new configure file to a
source file instead of a patch before you check things in.

APPROVED

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]