[Bug 2352439] New: Package Request: udp2raw - A tunnel that turns UDP traffic into encrypted UDP/FakeTCP/ICMP traffic by using raw sockets

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2352439

            Bug ID: 2352439
           Summary: Package Request: udp2raw - A tunnel that turns UDP
                    traffic into encrypted UDP/FakeTCP/ICMP traffic by
                    using raw sockets
           Product: Fedora
           Version: 42
          Hardware: All
               URL: https://github.com/wangyu-/udp2raw
                OS: Linux
            Status: NEW
         Component: Package Review
          Keywords: RFE
          Severity: medium
          Assignee: nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
          Reporter: fedoraproject.org@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
        QA Contact: extras-qa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
                CC: package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  Target Milestone: ---
    Classification: Fedora



Project homepage: https://github.com/wangyu-/udp2raw

I'd like to request a package of udp2raw, a tunnel that turns UDP traffic into
encrypted UDP/FakeTCP/ICMP traffic by using raw sockets.

It is commonly used with VPN software to bypass UDP firewalls or unstable UDP
environments. For example, it's an alternative to OpenVPN's TCP mode, and
allows the use of WireGuard in such environments. In FakeTCP mode it neatly
avoids the major disadvantages of common UDP-over-TCP tunnelling by mimicking
TCP with raw sockets, but effectively still using UDP behind the scenes. It's
somewhat similar to udptunnel, but does a few things different and e.g. can't
be detected by Wireshark. udp2raw thus allows the undisclosed use of WireGuard
VPNs by e.g. journalists and activists in sensitive environments.

The software is written in C/C++ and released under the terms of the MIT
License.

I'm not affiliated with the udp2raw project and no C/C++ developer (I can't
even read the code properly), thus it would be unwise for me to assume I could
become the package maintainer of udp2raw. Thus I'd like to ask whether an
established Fedora package maintainer might be willing to take maintainership
of a possible future udp2raw package. It's some very neat piece of software,
thus a package would be very much appreciated.

Reproducible: Always


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2352439

Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202352439%23c0

-- 
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux