https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2300113 Mateus Rodrigues Costa <mateusrodcosta@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo?(mateusrodcosta@gm | |ail.com) | --- Comment #9 from Mateus Rodrigues Costa <mateusrodcosta@xxxxxxxxx> --- > rpmlint gives error both on rpm file (see review text above). So, about those messages: ``` bign-handheld-thumbnailer.src: E: spelling-error ('roms', '%description -l en_US roms -> toms, rims, oms') bign-handheld-thumbnailer.x86_64: E: spelling-error ('roms', '%description -l en_US roms -> toms, rims, oms') bign-handheld-thumbnailer.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary bign-handheld-thumbnailer 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 1 warnings, 7 filtered, 2 badness; has taken 0.3 s ``` "roms" is a valid word, specially when related to videogames, which is the context here (i.e. "game roms"). So that message can be safely ignored. And, yes, I didn't put the effort yet to create a man page. Since it's just a thumbaniler there might not be as much benefit in having a man page, but I still plan on trying to create one in the future. > Looks good, but I am running into issues with debuginfo package. So, about ``` UnicodeDecodeError: 'utf-8' codec can't decode byte 0xe1 in position 443: invalid continuation byte ``` I asked on the Fedora Rust SIG Matrix room and they basically said: > 🤷 Don't think it's an important check, particularly on a debuginfo package. They did worrry a bit that since I am using meson and meson macros, the correct Rust build flags are being set. --- IMHO those warning are not important, but you can always ping some Rust packager to confirm. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2300113 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202300113%23c9 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
