Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gridengine - Grid Engine - Distributed Computing Management software https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=316141 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2008-02-08 12:11 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=294385) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=294385&action=view) Updated license text For 6.1u3-6: * License: - Ah.. I checked debuginfo file and I noticed that qtcsh source codes are actually used (for qtcsh only). So I updated the license document. The spec file must be updated as: ---------------------------------------------------------------- Name: gridengine Version: 6.1u3 Release: 6%{?dist} Summary: Grid Engine - Distributed Computing Management software Group: Applications/System # Only the file %{_libexecdir}/gridengine/bin/*/qmake is # under GPLv2+, which is not used or linked by other parts # of gridengine. # And the file %{_libexecdir}/gridengine/bin/*/qtcsh is # under BSD with advertising, # which is not used or linked by other parts of gridengine. License: (BSD and LGPLv2+ and MIT and SISSL) and GPLv2+ and BSD with advertising URL: http://gridengine.sunsource.net/ ......................... (The license of other subpackages need not updated) ......................... %{_libdir}/libjuti.so # Only the file %{_libexecdir}/gridengine/bin/*/qmake is # under GPLv2+ # And only the file %{_libexecdir}/gridengine/bin/*/qtcsh is # under BSD with advertising %{_libexecdir}/gridengine/ ---------------------------------------------------------------- License tag got very complicated :) Other things are okay!! ----------------------------------------------------------------- This package (gridengine) is APPROVED by me ----------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review