https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2334903 --- Comment #24 from Anthony Oon <anthony.zh.oon@xxxxxxxxx> --- SPEC URL: https://github.com/AnthonyZhOon/ghostty-rpm/releases/download/v1.1.2/ghostty.spec SRPM URL: https://github.com/AnthonyZhOon/ghostty-rpm/releases/download/v1.1.2/ghostty-1.1.2-1.fc41.src.rpm 1.1.2 release. Skipped 1.1.1 as it had a bug that required a new release - Require hicolor-icon-themes for ownership of the icon directories - Split subpackage ghostty-nautilus for 'Open in Ghostty' integration - New bundled dependency zig-gobject - Use a single license field on the main package listing Looking at the review file, there's still some unowned directories for vim, nvim, bat highlighting integration and servicemenus for dolphin 'Open in Ghostty' file explorer integration. What is the recommended way to specify that these are extras that are ideally installed but shouldn't bring in every dependency? I think a weak 'suggests' works but won't install by default and reverse dependencies would fit but should wait om passing review. I found the reason why the fedora-review tool can't download from the ghostty mirror. It uses urllib which is a blocked user-agent by Cloudflare (https://deps.files.ghostty.org/ is hosted there) In python >>> import urllib.request >>> request.urlopen("https://cloudflare.com";) # http403 >>> request.urlopen("https://deps.files.ghostty.org/";) # http403 Changing the user-agent from "User-Agent: Python-urllib/3.13" to an alternative can fix this Dependencies are mirrored by ghostty as the codeberg source repos are frequently unavailable -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2334903 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202334903%23c24 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
