https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2311762 --- Comment #12 from Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@xxxxxxxxxx> --- I can see this is a tricky package. Issues (which the packager is aware of already): (1) unversioned .so files (2) bundled and locally modified libraries (3) bundled unmodified libraries that need patching to remove (4) bundled and unused library (libtelnet) Some issues that I'm not clear on: (5) Do we need FESCO permission to bundle those libraries? Or is adding the Provides bundled sufficient? Reading the policy (linked below) it seems as if we're OK just to add the Provides. (6) What, if anything, is the upstream status of the patches? Are they forever downstream or is there an attempt to get them upstream? (7) Can we make it easier to unbundle things by working with upstream, eg by adding more cmake -DUSE_SYSTEM_XXX flags? And remove the unnecessary libtelnet at the same time? (8) Needs to follow the bundled policy here (by adding a comment in the spec file): https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Bundled_Software_policy/ https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#bundling -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2311762 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202311762%23c12 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
