Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: publican - publication tool chain https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427481 ------- Additional Comments From kwade@xxxxxxxxxx 2008-02-07 12:23 EST ------- Curious as to why the GFDL is being used for the -docs? Of course, this is not a Fedora document, and the license choice is at the discretion of the upstream. But if you ever wanted Fedora to publish the how-to documentation included in this package, it needs to be under the OPL without restrictions. If you want to leave that concern for the future, Red Hat (as the copyright holder) can always relicense or dual license. But since you are addressing the licensing in the -brand packages, thought you might want to handle this one at the same time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review