https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2338778 --- Comment #6 from Ben Beasley <code@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- Thanks, I’ll get to re-reviewing this as soon as I have a chance. (In reply to Benson Muite from comment #3) > Still have a running and almost indestructible i686 machine. This may be true, but the last full i686 release of Fedora was Fedora 30. We don’t build an i686 kernel, publish i686 repos, or prepare i686 release artifacts. The only reason we still have i686 at all is to support multilib on x86_64 releases, which is basically just to support Steam and Wine. More details are in https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/EncourageI686LeafRemoval. So – does building an i686 package of this command-line tool for Fedora do you any good as an i686 hardware owner, given that you already can’t run Fedora on it? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2338778 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202338778%23c6 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
