Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: publican - publication tool chain https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427481 ------- Additional Comments From wolfy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2008-02-07 05:12 EST ------- Source RPM: publican.src: W: invalid-license GPL2 In the source I see that GPLv2+ (all the /bin/*), GPL and GFDL are all mentioned. In the same line, since you are upstream, could you please include the license file(s) in the source ? Desktop file: vendor should be fedora. Also, I think it is not really nice to dynamically create the desktop file, but that may be just me too picky. There is no downloadable source. Any chance of having a full URL in the Source tag ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review