https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2323071 --- Comment #6 from Ben Beasley <code@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Ben Beasley from comment #5) > Yes, technically, as I understand it, Versioneer has been > LicenseRef-Fedora-Public-Domain, then CC0-1.0, and then Unlicense, in > different versions, and the generated _version.py files have always had the > same licenses as the copy of Versioneer that generated them. I don’t think > that making a mistake here has much consequence since these are all > ultra-permissive and the _version.py files are so trivial that it’s > questionable whether they contain anything copyrightable, but I do *try* to > get this right. (When I say _version.py files are trivial, I’m speaking of the _version.py files that are only a few lines and just contain metadata, like the one in the binary RPM here, not the ones with many lines of Python source code, like the one in the source archive here.) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2323071 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202323071%23c6 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
