Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedora-ds: Meta-package for Fedora Directory Server Suite Alias: fedora-ds https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428368 ------- Additional Comments From rmeggins@xxxxxxxxxx 2008-02-06 17:54 EST ------- (In reply to comment #8) > (In reply to comment #7) > > > Unfortunately, I don't think it can be a noarch package, because most of its > > dependencies are arch specific packages (fedora-ds-base, fedora-ds-admin). How > > would that work? > > We don't care about the architecture of dependencies. So if I do yum install fedora-ds on an x86_64 system, what happens? Does it pull in fedora-ds-base.x86_64 or fedora-ds-base.i386? If the latter, and I really want (and expect since I'm running on an x86_64 system) to get fedora-ds-base.x86_64 picked up as a dependency, how does that work? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review