[Bug 2328743] Review Request: python-azure-mgmt-postgresqlflexibleservers - The Microsoft Azure Postgresqlflexibleservers Management Client Library

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2328743



--- Comment #10 from Jeremy Cline <jeremy@xxxxxxxxxx> ---
> - A newer version, 1.1.0b2, is available.

Yeah, as you suspect it's because of azure-cli's strict pinning. I keep
thinking about having azure-cli bundle its dependencies so other SDK users
aren't stuck on odd versions, but it's never been high enough on my list to
investigate thoroughly.

> Oh, one suggestion I missed in the original review feedback. The
> pyproject-rpm-macros are already correctly marking as %license the license
> file in the .dist-info directory via %{pyproject_files}, so you don’t have
> to install a duplicate copy manually.
> 
>   $ rpm -qL -p
> results/python3-azure-mgmt-postgresqlflexibleservers-1.1.0~b1-1.fc42.noarch.
> rpm 
>  
> /usr/lib/python3.13/site-packages/azure_mgmt_postgresqlflexibleservers-1.1.
> 0b1.dist-info/LICENSE
>   /usr/share/licenses/python3-azure-mgmt-postgresqlflexibleservers/LICENSE
> 
> You can remove
> 
>   %license LICENSE
> 
> and change
> 
>   %pyproject_save_files azure
> 
> to
> 
>   %pyproject_save_files -l azure
> 
> to “assert” that a license file was included in the %{pyproject_files}; this
> guards against the license file “disappearing” in a future update, perhaps
> by upstream switching to a build backend that no longer sets the PEP 639
> License-File field.

Ah very nice, I wasn't aware of that!

> Finally, as a very minor nitpick, you might consider removing “This package
> has been tested with Python 3.8+.” from the description. Since people will
> only be using RPM packages with the system Python interpreter and can assume
> that it’s supported, it’s not really useful information.

Yeah, makes sense.

I'll address both during the package import (and on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2328742), thanks for the reviews!


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2328743

Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202328743%23c10

-- 
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux