https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2337051 Artem <ego.cordatus@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value --- Comment #2 from Artem <ego.cordatus@xxxxxxxxx> --- Rationale: This more like re-review. Rationale: RetroArch now using release tags for their sub-projects like assets, databases, etc (see: https://github.com/libretro/retroarch-assets/issues/414). Splitting RPM sub-packages to separate packages will make it easier updating/building RetroArch and all it's stuff. It also could simplify Spec file for RPM Fusion build and speedup building process, save disc space (assets SRPM itself is about ~470MB). retroarch-assets would be better to keep as weak dep since some users still prefer to download it manually from app itself. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2337051 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202337051%23c2 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
