https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2334700 --- Comment #13 from Jonathan Steffan <jonathansteffan@xxxxxxxxx> --- Issues: ======= - Python packages must not contain %{pythonX_site(lib|arch)}/* in %files Note: Package contains %{pythonX_site(lib|arch)}/* in %files See: https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/782 [!]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. Note: Unversioned so-files in private %_libdir subdirectory (see attachment). Verify they are not in ld path. I think this is fine: /usr/lib64/python3.13/site-packages/filter.cpython-313-x86_64-linux-gnu.so [!]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise justified. Publish our patch upstream and link to it. [!]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [!]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in python3-cnkalman Adding this BR fixes both issues. [!]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [!]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Package fails to build on 32bit. https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=127741108 [!]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [!]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python Why can't we use the files automation? If we can't, be more explicit: %files -n python3-%{name} %{python3_sitearch}/%{name}/ %{python3_sitearch}/%{name}/filter.cpython-313-x86_64-linux-gnu.so Also, update the main %files for the DSO to be: %{_libdir}/lib%{name}.so.0{,.*} [!]: %check is present and all tests pass. Add %check but disable by default. cnkalman.x86_64: E: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libcnkalman.so.0 cnSetZero (/usr/lib64/libcnkalman.so.0) I'm not sure what to do here. This seems like an upsteam bug and I know is also impacting testing. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2334700 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202334700%23c13 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue