Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libdstr - Dave's String class https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431692 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2008-02-06 12:23 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > Well, actually something strange. On my *rawhide* machine, > > when I manually try "rpmbuild -ba", the compilation log says: > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Processing files: libdstr-devel-20080124-1.fc9 > > Requires(rpmlib): rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 > > rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 > > Requires: libdstr.so.2 > > Processing files: libdstr-debuginfo-20080124-1.fc9 > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > But > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > [tasaka1@localhost SPECS]$ rpm -qp --requires > > ../RPMS/i386/libdstr-devel-20080124-1.fc9.i386.rpm > > libdstr = 20080124-1.fc9 > > libdstr.so.2 > > rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 > > rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > So actually libdstr-devel requires libdstr = %name-%version. > > Perhaps "rpm" side (and packages "rpm" depends on) changed somewhat? > > Anyway it seems to be working. (Maybe I have to file a bug against > > "rpm"??) > > looks like that. Filed as bug 431721 as not only libdstr seems affected. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=398488 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=398489 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review