https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2316576 --- Comment #8 from Davide Cavalca <davide@xxxxxxxxxxxx> --- [!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "zlib License", "Unknown or generated", "*No copyright* Public domain", "mit_whatever", "BSD 3-Clause License", "BSD 3-Clause License and/or mit_whatever", "*No copyright* SIL Open Font License 1.1", "Khronos License and/or zlib License", "MIT License and/or zlib License", "Khronos License and/or MIT License", "MIT License", "Apache License 2.0", "Khronos License", "zlib License [generated file]", "NTP License and/or zlib License". 140 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /tmp/review-sdl2-compat/licensecheck.txt It looks like this bundles some sources of varied licenses, please double check. [!]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. Note: Dirs in package are owned also by: /usr/include/SDL2(SDL2-devel), /usr/lib64/cmake/SDL2(SDL2-devel) If this is meant to replace SDL2 it's probably fine [!]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in sdl2-compat-devel , sdl2-compat-static You do have this, so I'm not sure why it's triggering [!]: %check is present and all tests pass. Is there a test suite you can run? sdl2-compat-devel.aarch64: E: static-library-without-debuginfo /usr/lib64/libSDL2_test.a sdl2-compat-devel.aarch64: E: static-library-without-debuginfo /usr/lib64/libSDL2main.a sdl2-compat-static.aarch64: E: static-library-without-debuginfo /usr/lib64/libSDL2.a Is the build system stripping the static libraries? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2316576 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202316576%23c8 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
