Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libffi - High level programming interface to various calling conventions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431633 tcallawa@xxxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jakub@xxxxxxxxxx ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa@xxxxxxxxxx 2008-02-06 10:24 EST ------- One of my pending applications (gambas2) needs it. g-wrap needs it. That in and of itself says that there is a need for this library to be packaged system-wide, rather than buried in multiple copies of individual packages. The security concerns around that are enough reason to separate it. I would prefer to see this generated out of GCC, but barring that, I'll maintain it myself. It builds fine (and works fine) as a standalone library. Also, I think you're misinterpreting what Jakub said. He said that he believes that libffi should be packaged separately from gcc for other packages to use, which is precisely what I'm doing here. I'm adding Jakub to the CC on this bug, so that he can either confirm or deny this. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review