[Bug 2333051] Review Request: Java-WebSocket - A barebones WebSocket client and server implementation written in 100% Java

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2333051



--- Comment #3 from Mattia Verga <mattia.verga@xxxxxxxxx> ---
Spec URL: https://mattia.fedorapeople.org/java-websocket/Java-WebSocket.spec
SRPM URL:
https://mattia.fedorapeople.org/java-websocket/Java-WebSocket-1.6.0-2.fc42.src.rpm

The 'ADDITIONAL_LICENSE_INFO' file is autogenerated and injected by java docs
macro, as well as other license exceptions files regarding assembler code and
jquery. I've checked some other java packages in Fedora and it seems no one is
marking them as actual licenses...

About the pom.xml file, docs says it should be automatically installed by
%mvn_install. I see that macro is installing it as Java-WebSocket.pom. The
packaging guidelines aren't very clear, but I assume it's the way it should be?


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2333051

Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202333051%23c3

-- 
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux