Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qtcurve - Metapackage to install both sides of QtCurve https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=238817 bugzilla@xxxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide ------- Additional Comments From laurent.rineau__fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2008-02-05 06:46 EST ------- :-) I was about to construct package for QtCurve-0.55, and submit them to Fedora. Kelly, can you update to QtCurve-0.55 in bug #238816 and bug #238815, and also provide the KDE4 style? I am using this style in both Gtk2/KDE3/Qt4 apps, and my desktop now looks better. In my opinion, the current meta-package should not exist. Anyway, should it exist, then the requirements should be: kde-style-qtcurve = %{version}, gtk-qtcurve-engine = %{version} (In reply to comment #1) > imo, this is is kinda pointless, but who am I to judge? :) Rex, you are the maintainer of gtk-qt-engine. I do not understand your point, here. In my opinion, using QtCurve for both KDE3, KDE4 and Gtk is a better option than gtk-qt-engine, because it offers a quite-uniform look for all the desktop, even for KDE3/KDE4. Until all KDE3 applications are ported to KDE4, I will prefere to use QtCurve instead of a mix of Oxygen (for KDE4) and any other style for Gtk2/KDE3/Qt3. And, IMO, Oxygen is ugly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review