https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2329101 --- Comment #7 from Fabio Valentini <decathorpe@xxxxxxxxx> --- See also comment here: https://github.com/Devolutions/picky-rs/issues/332#issuecomment-2531885812 and my followup. Not sure why they feel so "attacked" by the issue I filed ... I would suggest the following next steps to move this package along: 1. include license texts from upstream GitHub project as separate sources until upstream includes them in the published crates > Source1: https://github.com/Devolutions/picky-rs/raw/picky-test-data-0.1.0/LICENSE-APACHE > Source2: https://github.com/Devolutions/picky-rs/raw/picky-test-data-0.1.0/LICENSE-MIT in %prep: > cp -pav %{SOURCE1} %{SOURCE2} . in %files devel: replace FIXME item with > %license %{crate_instdir}/LICENSE-APACHE > %license %{crate_instdir}/LICENSE-MIT 2. link upstream ticket regarding source of test data (i.e. document in the spec file that the files are either generated manually, or a certificate chain from some other provider to test some edge case) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2329101 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202329101%23c7 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
