[Bug 2331684] Review Request: fontmake - Compile fonts from sources (UFO, Glyphs) to binary (OpenType, TrueType)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2331684



--- Comment #12 from Ben Beasley <code@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> ---
Thank you for the review!

(In reply to Miro Hrončok from comment #7)
> The spec is sane.
> 
> Consider using a SourceLicense tag to record the additional licenses.

That’s easy enough to do here, and I don’t object to doing it here, but I’m
curious – are we moving in the direction of encouraging this across the board
in Fedora? It looks like there are fewer than 50 packages currently using
SourceLicense in Fedora overall, which is fewer than the number of packages I
would add it to if I adapted SourceLicense in my “own” packages.

> For help2man consider using %py3_test_envvars.

That’s a good idea. It defines more environment variables than I’m doing
manually here, but it tidies up the spec file.

(In reply to Miro Hrončok from comment #10)
> Consider filtering some of those in
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rpmlint/blob/rawhide/f/rpmlint.config#_451

That’s not a bad idea. I didn’t realize rpmlint carried a generic collection of
jargon words.

Particularly useful would be [Mm]etapackage, which rpmlint flags on every
Python extra metapackage and every Rust feature metapackage.

(In reply to Miro Hrončok from comment #11)
> https://pagure.io/FedoraReview/pull-request/526

Thanks for looking into that! But why was the
python3.13dist(fonttools[unicode]) dependency unsolvable?
python3-fonttools+unicode exists and has had appropriate Provides for
fonttools[unicode] for a long time.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2331684

Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202331684%23c12

-- 
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux