[Bug 2328487] Review Request: rust-icu_collections - Collection of API for use in ICU libraries

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2328487



--- Comment #4 from Ben Beasley <code@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> ---
Thank you for the review.

(In reply to Fabio Valentini from comment #3)
> There are quite a number of packages that start to depend on postcard, it
> might make sense to package it eventually.

I thought about it, just to avoid having to carry so many patches, but I gave
it a quick attempt and it seemed “annoying.”

While postcard seems actively maintained, it requires the cobs crate by the
same author, which has a few languishing issues and PR’s
(https://github.com/jamesmunns/cobs.rs). Then, depending on whether one wants
to try to support all the features, one might be packaging postcard-derive,
defmt, and/or embedded-io crates. There are also co-developed postcard-schema
and postcard-dyn crates that may or may not get pulled in.

Looking at https://crates.io/crates/postcard/reverse_dependencies, unless
someone tries again on wasmtime in Fedora, postcard would only be packaged as a
common but minor dev-dependency for the icu4x stack, supporting examples and
the occasional extra integration test. Having postcard packaged *would* save a
lot of patching, and I’m not opposed to the idea in principle, but I’m not
convinced it’s really worth dealing with the whole postcard stack if nothing is
going to use it “in real life.”


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2328487

Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202328487%23c4

-- 
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux