https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2277910 --- Comment #40 from Jens Petersen <petersen@xxxxxxxxxx> --- One idea I wanted to add/propose (for the fast moving versions - since lean4 is on a monthly release cadence, ie somewhat faster than rust): Long ago I did versioned subpackaging of ghc (compare with the current ghcX.Y coverage) - ie there was a main ghc package providing also ghcX.Y.Z subpackages which for better or worse would persist (remain) installed after a ghc version update. Probably some would argue reasonably that this would be unreasonable - though just occurred to me a further workaround could be to add an optional/recommended obsoletes subpackage to remove older subpkg versions. But I feel this could work reasonably well for lean4 with its fast cadence - addressing the upstream concerns about multi-version support. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2277910 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202277910%23c40 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
