[Bug 2323071] Review Request: python-etelemetry - Etelemetry python client API

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2323071



--- Comment #3 from Sandro <gui1ty@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> ---
Thanks for the review

(In reply to Ben Beasley from comment #2)
> Issues:
> =======

<snip>

>     ## License
>     
>     To make Versioneer easier to embed, all its code is dedicated to the
> public
>     domain. The `_version.py` that it creates is also in the public domain.
>     Specifically, both are released under the Creative Commons "Public Domain
>     Dedication" license (CC0-1.0), as described in
>     https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ .
> 
>   Fedora has versioneer 0.29, and you’re using the system versioneer, so you
>   have an Unlicense-licensed version of versioneer – although with similar
>   language conflating the “public domain” with the chosen ultra-permissive
>   license. Why does that matter? Because as described in versioneer’s
>   README.md, the _version.py generated by Versioneer is considered to be
> under
>   the same license as Versioneer itself:
>  
> https://github.com/python-versioneer/python-versioneer/tree/0.29?tab=readme-
> ov-file#license
> 
>   Therefore, strictly speaking, the license for this package should be
>   "Apache-2.0 AND Unlicense".

Thanks for the detailed explanation.

What about packages that use Versioneer prior to the switch to Unlicense
(<0.27)? Would I have to add "AND CC0-1.0"? I believe I maintain a couple of
packages using Versioneer. So far, I have never paid attention to the license
of _version.py nor to which version of Versioneer is shipped in the sources if
any.

Spec URL: https://gui1ty.fedorapeople.org/review/python-etelemetry.spec
SRPM URL:
https://gui1ty.fedorapeople.org/review/python-etelemetry-0.3.1-2.fc42.src.rpm


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2323071

Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202323071%23c3

-- 
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux