https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2327093 --- Comment #3 from Fabio Valentini <decathorpe@xxxxxxxxx> --- Not committing (yet) to do a formal review of this package - just wanted to ask whether it might make sense to rename the built "binary" package and the manually added "-devel" package? The shipped library is "librustc_demangle.so", so I think the "expected" package names would be "librustc_demangle" and "librustc_demangle-devel". Having the package names be "rustc-demangle-capi" and "rustc-demangle-capi-devel" would be a bit weird ("-n %crate" is just the name generated by rust2rpm, but for shared libraries, we override this in almost all existing packages). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2327093 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202327093%23c3 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue