https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2276549 --- Comment #16 from Xavier Bertaux <bertauxx@xxxxxxxxx> --- Hi solomoncyl, following the last email received, I modified the license by GPL-3.0-or-later AND GPL-2.0-or-later AND CC-BY-SA-4.0 since part of the code uses the GPL2 license (old code) and another uses the GPL3 license and the datas are under CC-BY-SA-4.0 license to avoid any warning. For the ambiguity on the COPYING.txt file (which corresponds to the GPL2 license I also modified in the file section so that it is taken as a license (following the procedure). I just uploaded the two files to the same place so the links remain the same. I did not increment the version number Release: 1%{?dist} tell me if this is necessary as it is or not Cheers Xavier -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2276549 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202276549%23c16 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
