[Bug 2305882] Review Request: papers - View multipage documents

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2305882



--- Comment #41 from Fabio Valentini <decathorpe@xxxxxxxxx> ---
In general, the package looks good to me. Just some minor things that I'd like
to have clarified and / or fixed:

> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/EncourageI686LeafRemoval

This is not really applicable - it's not a removal, this package is just not
going to be built for i686 from the start. 
You wouldn't need to document or justify this ExcludeArch at all, but it
doesn't hurt to include the link, I guess.

> # Filter out soname provides for plugins
> %global __provides_exclude_from ^%{_libdir}/papers/.*\\.so$

Please put this at the top of the spec file. Putting %globals in the middle of
the spec file makes them really hard to find, and it might even get lost (i.e.
become part of the %description, if it were just a few lines later).

> -Dintrospection=disabled

I seem to recall that some Rust-written tool is missing to get this enabled?
Is this on your roadmap, or should we put that on the Rust SIG wishlist?

> %{_libdir}/libppsshell-4.0.so.4{,.*}
> %{_libdir}/libppsdocument-4.0.so.5{,.*}
> %{_libdir}/libppsview-4.0.so.4{,.*}

Is it intentional that some libraries are in the "main" papers package while
the other two are in the "-libs" subpackage?

> %{_datadir}/thumbnailers/

It looks like nothing owns this directory?
I'm not sure whether I'm using DNF5 correctly, but its repoquery gives me zero
results.
If that is the case, this package will need to co-own the
/usr/share/thumbnailers/ directory.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2305882

Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202305882%23c41

-- 
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux