Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocfs2-tools - programs for managing Ocfs2 file systems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431277 ------- Additional Comments From mark@xxxxxxxxxx 2008-02-01 17:46 EST ------- The package builds successfully on my x86_64 and i386 systems. Rpmlint is clean on the spec file, the SRPM, the ocfs2console rpm and the debuginfo rpm. On ocfs2-tools-devel-1.3.9-4.20080131git.x86_64.rpm I get: $ rpmlint ocfs2-tools-devel-1.3.9-4.20080131git.x86_64.rpm ocfs2-tools-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation Which I believe should be fine as no documentation is provided upstream. On ocfs2-tools-1.3.9-4.20080131git.x86_64.rpm I get: $ rpmlint ocfs2-tools-1.3.9-4.20080131git.x86_64.rpm ocfs2-tools.x86_64: W: service-default-enabled /etc/init.d/ocfs2 ocfs2-tools.x86_64: W: service-default-enabled /etc/init.d/ocfs2 ocfs2-tools.x86_64: W: service-default-enabled /etc/init.d/o2cb ocfs2-tools.x86_64: W: service-default-enabled /etc/init.d/o2cb ocfs2-tools.x86_64: E: subsys-not-used /etc/init.d/o2cb I believe an exception should be made in that the Ocfs2 cluster services should be enabled by default. It's common for a user to have critical software loaded at boot from an Ocfs2 file system and leaving the services off by default (thus making their file systems unmountable) violates the principal of least surprise, and could actually result in a loss of availability. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review