https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2321590 --- Comment #3 from Mattias Ellert <mattias.ellert@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- As you already pointed out, these are plugins. Xrootd expects the plugins to be in the default library path and does not use a separate subfolder for plugins. However, xrootd has something similar to a soname for its plugins, namely the plugin version. In this case the -5 in the plugin names indicate these are plugins for xrootd major version 5: /usr/lib64/libXrdHTTPServer-5.so /usr/lib64/libXrdS3-5.so This plugin version serves the same purpose as the soname, in a way. It is possible to install e.g. both an xrootd with major version 4 and major version 5 in parallel and have both versions have their plugins in /usr/lib(64) without filename conflicts. The plugin interfaces are guaranteed not to change within the same major version. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2321590 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202321590%23c3 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
