Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aspell-ml - Malayalam wordlist for GNU Aspell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=403911 sundaram@xxxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sundaram@xxxxxxxxxx ------- Additional Comments From sundaram@xxxxxxxxxx 2008-02-01 11:58 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > Parag, that looks like a strange request to me (coming from debian background). > If the package is of good quality and people want to use it, what stops it from > being included in the repository? > > It would be definitely good for people to review other people's work but that > should not be a condition for including this work (again the way debian does it > looks right to me). There are multiple differences and it wouldn't be suitable to expand on all of that in a review request but briefly, Fedora sponsors the submitter (as opposed to just the package) and then gives commit and upload access to not only the individual package but nearly the entire repository. So it make sense for the proposed maintainer to demonstrate reasonable amount of understanding of packaging guidelines. The way they demonstrate that understanding is by reviewing other packages before getting sponsored. This process is comparatively very light weight. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review