https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2320142 Petr Menšík <pemensik@xxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |pemensik@xxxxxxxxxx Flags| |fedora-review? CC| |pemensik@xxxxxxxxxx --- Comment #3 from Petr Menšík <pemensik@xxxxxxxxxx> --- I am not sure how wfserver should be used exactly. But if that is indeed a service, it should have either system or user systemd service packaged too. At least from its name it seems so. It seems resampler/ contains similar header as speexdsp-devel-1.2.1-5.fc39.x86_64 package. Are they compatible? Should be speexdsp be used during build and local copy deleted? At least resampler/COPYING contains outdated GNU Temple address. If it contains non-trivial local changes, it should be included in spec with Provides: bundled(speexdsp). Ideally with version of bundled copy, if known. I think issue should be created at upstream to try reuse system speexdsp library, if it has version high enough. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2320142 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202320142%23c3 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
