https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2310497 --- Comment #12 from Fabio Valentini <decathorpe@xxxxxxxxx> --- > ExclusiveArch: x86_64 This is the correct way to handle architecture-specific stuff for *applications*, but for Rust crates, they're a bit different ... Due to the way repositories are set up in koji, noarch packages are present in repos for *all* architectures. And since Rust library packages (rust-*-devel) *are* noarch packages, they need to have satisfiable dependencies regardless of architecture. In this case, I would recommend to use a rust2rpm.toml config file (see rust2rpm.toml(5) man page) with these contents, and to regenerate the package: ``` [package] supported-arches = ["x86_64"] ``` That setting causes rust2rpm to generate a .spec file that builds the library on all architectures, but only actually runs "cargo build" and "cargo test" on supported architectures. This works around the problem of architecture-independent noarch packages in fedora infrastructure, and avoids creating broken dependencies. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2310497 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202310497%23c12 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue