https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2121490 --- Comment #31 from Fabio Valentini <decathorpe@xxxxxxxxx> --- > It seems to be a bug-fix patch for the official package. Yes, because sodiumoxide is archived and abandoned. :) > I would still need all the dependencies of sodiumoxide - which is the hard part. I don't think it would be hard - they're literally all already available in Fedora. > So ideally, the sodiumoxide package could include the bugfix patches from cjdns. This is true, that would be another solution, but you'd need to patch cjdns to use it instead of the git snapshot they're referencing now. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2121490 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202121490%23c31 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
