[Bug 2317585] Review Request: ramalama - RamaLama is a command line tool for working with AI LLM models.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2317585



--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Steffan <jonathansteffan@xxxxxxxxx> ---
[!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
     Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
     found: "Unknown or generated", "MIT License", "*No copyright* Apache
     License 2.0". 70 files have unknown license. Detailed output of
     licensecheck in /home/jon/Reviews/python-ramalama/licensecheck.txt

License is MIT


[!]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python

Please re-read
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Python/

I'm noticing things like the use of %{python3_pkgversion} when it should be
%{python3_version} or %{python3_version_nodots}.

I also wonder why you didn't use %pyproject_buildrequires techniques. We should
use those if it's possible.


[!]: Latest version is packaged.

New version available.


[!]: SourceX tarball generation or download is documented.
     Note: Package contains tarball without URL, check comments

Update the source to be a link to an upstream release tar.


[!]: %check is present and all tests pass.

No tests are being ran. We should add these.


[!]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.
     Note: %define requiring justification: %define
     _python_dist_allow_version_zero 1


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2317585

Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202317585%23c3

-- 
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux