https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2316327 --- Comment #10 from Benson Muite <benson_muite@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- Please change License: GPLv2 or BSD to License: (GPL-2.0-or-Later AND BSD-3-Clause) OR (BSD-2-Clause AND BSD-3-Clause) or License: (GPL-2.0-only AND BSD-3-Clause) OR (BSD-2-Clause AND BSD-3-Clause) see https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/legal/spdx/#_spdx_matching_guidelines https://github.com/cornelisnetworks/opa-fm/blob/master/IbAccess/Common/Public/iquickmap.c Check on original sources for iquickmap.c to determine if it is GPL-2.0-only or GPL-2.0-or-later The main license file seems to just be BSD-3-Clause, perhaps also add a brief explanation of which files are under which license. Intel Open Source License also seems to be used (please check if it is only for build files, or also for applies to code in shipped binaries): https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/%40fedora-review/fedora-review-2316327-opa-fm/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/08127067-opa-fm/fedora-review/licensecheck.txt Ideally, each of the licenses would have a license file in the repository, in addition to each file having an indication which license it is under. Is it possible to For the files listing, you want something like %license LICENSE %doc README.md %dir %{_sysconfdir}/opa-fm %{_sysconfdir}/opa-fm/dgs %{_sysconfdir}/opa-fm/*.xml %{_sysconfdir}/opa-fm/vfs %dir %{_libdir}/opa-fm %dir %{_libdir}/opa-fm/bin %{_libdir}/opa-fm/bin/config_check %{_libdir}/opa-fm/bin/config_convert %{_libdir}/opa-fm/bin/config_diff %{_libdir}/opa-fm/bin/config_generate %{_libdir}/opa-fm/bin/fm_capture %{_libdir}/opa-fm/bin/fm_cmd %{_libdir}/opa-fm/bin/fm_cmdall %{_libdir}/opa-fm/bin/opafm %{_libdir}/opa-fm/bin/opafmconfigpp %{_libdir}/opa-fm/bin/opafmctrl %{_libdir}/opa-fm/bin/opafmd %{_libdir}/opa-fm/bin/opafmvf %{_libdir}/opa-fm/bin/opafmxmlextract %{_libdir}/opa-fm/bin/opafmxmlfilter %{_libdir}/opa-fm/bin/smpoolsize %dir %{_libdir}/opa-fm/runtime %{_libdir}/opa-fm/runtime/fe %{_libdir}/opa-fm/runtime/sm %dir %{_libdir}/opa-fm/systemd %dir %{_libdir}/opa-fm/systemd/system %{_libdir}/opa-fm/systemd/system/opafm.service %dir %{_libdir}/opa-fm/systemd/system/sbin %{_libdir}/opa-fm/systemd/system/sbinopafmcmd %{_libdir}/opa-fm/systemd/system/sbin/opafmcmdall %{_libdir}/opa-fm/systemd/system/sbin/opafmconfigpp %{_libdir}/opa-fm/systemd/system/sbin/opafmvf %dir %{_docdir}/opa-fm %{_mandir}/man8/opafmcmd.* %{_mandir}/man8/opafmcmdall.* %{_mandir}/man8/opafmconfigpp.* %dir %{_datadir}/opa-fm %{_datadir}/opa-fm/*.xml %dir %{_datadir}/opa-fm/samples %{_datadir}/opa-fm/samples/*.cnf-sample Binary files and libraries should be explicitly listed, though and configuration files can be globbed The install script hard copies using lib, and it would be better to use lib64 on 64bit architectures: https://github.com/cornelisnetworks/opa-fm/blob/master/Esm/fm_install.sh#L43 Created a pull request to fix this: https://github.com/cornelisnetworks/opa-fm/pull/33 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2316327 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202316327%23c10 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
