[Bug 2316282] Review Request: svt-av1-psy - SVT-AV1 with perceptual enhancements optimal AV1 encoding

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2316282

Richard Fontana <rfontana@xxxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Flags|needinfo?(rfontana@redhat.c |
                   |om)                         |



--- Comment #6 from Richard Fontana <rfontana@xxxxxxxxxx> ---
(In reply to Cristian Le from comment #5)
> The license issue is with regards to the patents, not the BSD-3-Clause-Clear
> tag. Are the patents used there acceptable?

The reason why BSD-3-Clause-Clear (better known to some of us as ClearBSD) is
not allowed (by default) in Fedora is that it excludes the grant of a patent
license. In this case, what we have is a supplementing of that license with a
patent license in the PATENTS.md file.  The previous conclusion was basically
that the combination of the copyright license and the patent license was
acceptable as an open source license. 

If you think there is a patent issue that is not satisfactorily covered under
the license in the PATENTS file -- for example (this is completely
hypothetical, to be clear) you have specific reason to believe that the package
infringes patent X and you have specific reason to believe the license in the
PATENTS file doesn't extend to patent X -- we can look into that.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2316282

Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202316282%23c6

-- 
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux