https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2312901 --- Comment #13 from Ben Beasley <code@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Cristian Le from comment #12) > I'm actually referring to the difference between `0.3.0+2.15.1` on the crate > (and maybe in the dependents?) and `0.3.0` in the rpm. I don't know how rust > dependency checker is handling that. The metadata version field is automatically stripped by the Rust/cargo packaging scripts, both in the RPM package version and in generated RPM dependencies. This is why we have rust-blosc2-sys-0.3.1-1.fc42 instead of rust-blosc2-sys-0.3.1+X.Y.Z-1.fc42, and why that package satisfies the dependency from this crate. Fabio could surely explain if you have more detailed questions about where and how that happens, but it’s automatic and expected, and I’m not doing anything special to make it happen. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2312901 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202312901%23c13 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
