https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2313784 --- Comment #18 from Ben Beasley <code@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Fabio Valentini from comment #17) > Thanks Ben for the additional feedback - latest version of the package looks > good to me, with one minor exception that might need a clarification: > > > [?]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. > > Note: Unversioned so-files in private %_libdir subdirectory (see > > attachment). Verify they are not in ld path. > > This is due to "libjiter_python.so()(64bit)". > > I looked at other Python packages that provide native modules, and none of > them had RPM provides for their native .so modules - with one exception that > I could find, pydantic-core. I'm not sure what the difference is between > these two and other "native" Python extension modules, and if RPM should be > prevented from generating Provides for this .so file. After quite a bit of group investigation in the Fedora Python Matrix channel, we’ve concluded that this changed in Rust 1.81, and Fabio filed bug 2314879. I recommend adding the following workaround: # The Python extension module now gets a SONAME of libjiter_python.so; we # must ensure it is not used to generate automatic Provides. See: # Rust 1.81+ implicitly / automatically sets soname on cdylib targets # https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2314879 # https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/AutoProvidesAndRequiresFiltering/#_filtering_provides_and_requires_after_scanning %global __provides_exclude ^lib_jiter_python\\.so.*$ I’m working on adding similar workarounds to other Rust-based Python extensions, which will all be affected once they are rebuilt with Rust 1.81. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2313784 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202313784%23c18 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
