[Bug 2313339] Review Request: adoptium-temurin-java-repository - Third party repository providing temurin java

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2313339



--- Comment #9 from Thomas Fitzsimmons <fitzsim@xxxxxxxxxx> ---
> > - As I mentioned in email, I would like to see Temurin use the
> > "java-1.8.0-temurin" naming scheme.  Are aliases (somewhere, not sure where)
> > an option, such that "dnf install java-1.8.0-openjdk" maps to Temurin's
> > equivalent 1.8.0 package?
> 
> That is issue we have tor rise in
> https://github.com/adoptium/installer/issues/  I think it can start with
> virtual provides. The rename may be quite conmplicated for them. But virtual
> provide is no issue.
> Added to
> https://github.com/adoptium/installer/issues/848#issuecomment-2133516101 and
> created https://github.com/adoptium/installer/issues/1008

OK, thanks.  Virtual provides will further pre-complicate things, I think.  Do
we have a list of changes we want Adoptium to make that gates the inclusion of
this repository package?  I think there should be such a list, to avoid
introducing backward-compatibility traps to Fedora.  The inclusion of this
repository package into Fedora constitutes an endorsement that Temurin packages
are smoothly integrated, so any required smoothing should happen before this
repository package is included.  I suspect you are maintaining such a list, but
I think we should copy it into this review.

> > - What does lib/fedora-third-party/conf.d do?  It is not referenced in the
> > upstream instructions.  (I am only looking at the spec file so far, have not
> > attempted reverse-engineering behaviours based on the contents of the SRPM)
> 
> I was advised to include it as you see it during original Fesco discussion.
> TBH, I'm not sure I understand its usage too.

OK, can you figure it out why it is needed?  And if not, or if it is not
applicable, omit it?  (Otherwise explain its need in the comment.)


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2313339

Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202313339%23c9

-- 
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux