https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2312851 --- Comment #4 from Ondrej Mosnáček <omosnacek@xxxxxxxxx> --- Ah, you mean on EPEL9... I only tried it on Rawhide. I don't think it's worth trying to work around the dependency chain there, so I guess turning the tests off [by default] only on EPEL9 for now would be best. Then they could be enabled later when/if all the deps are bootstrapped in EPEL9. If the package ends up being EPEL9-only, then the conditionals can probably be simplified away, but that's not clear yet. Anyway, it would be nice to run %pyproject_check_import in the !%{with check} case so that at least trivial errors are caught (this is recommended in https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Python/#_running_tests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2312851 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202312851%23c4 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
