https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2310720 Ben Beasley <code@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |code@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx --- Comment #3 from Ben Beasley <code@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- The binary /usr/bin/julia conflicts with the julia package. Per [1], *something* needs to be done about this – it can’t just be an implicit conflict. I don’t think I understand this well enough to make a recommendation. I see that upstream recommends uninstalling all other Julias before using juliaup[2], and strongly recommends installing via "curl | bash" rather than using package managers[3] due to unspecified “drawbacks (that we hope to lift in the future).” I’m not sure what to think about all that. [1] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Conflicts/#_binary_name_conflicts [2] https://github.com/julialang/juliaup?tab=readme-ov-file#installation [3] https://github.com/julialang/juliaup?tab=readme-ov-file#software-repositories -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2310720 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202310720%23c3 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
