[Bug 2309760] Review Request: accel-ppp - High-performance VPN and broadband protocol server

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2309760



--- Comment #6 from Neil Hanlon <neil@xxxxxxxx> ---
Notes/Questions:

1) license SPDX appears to be (GPL-2.0-Only OR GPL-2.0-Or-Later OR MIT)
2) pcre package is deprecated, will this build with pcre2? may need to pull in
https://github.com/accel-ppp/accel-ppp/pull/185
3) when a package has a system unit associated, we need to handle this in the
pre/post sections of the rpm install; see
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Scriptlets/#_scriptlets
4) unversioned shared libraries must be handled -- see
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_shared_libraries --
if upstream cannot version them, we can maintain versioning on it downstream.
the unversioned .so files can be in a devel subpackage, if you want
5) you can use globs for non-library files, so instead of listing all the
entries in `%{_datadir}/accel-ppp/radius/`, you could just add
`%{_datadir}/accel-ppp/radius/dictionary*`. as long as it's not a shared
directory or is shared object libraries, globbing is OK.
6) need to own directories --      Note: Directories without known owners:
/usr/share/accel-ppp, /usr/lib64/accel-ppp, /usr/share/accel-ppp/l2tp,
/usr/share/accel-ppp/radius
7) can any tests be run in %check?

lastly, regarding

># We need Centos9 for modern Fedora versions alongside EPEL 9
> %cmake -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release -DCPACK_TYPE=Centos9

This is probably OK, but we should probably ask upstream if adding a Fedora
config would be possible, as that config will diverge from either Fedora or
CentOS/EPEL at some point in the future.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2309760

Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202309760%23c6

-- 
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux