https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2309679 --- Comment #5 from Robert Scheck <redhat-bugzilla@xxxxxxxxxxxx> --- Manual comparison between extracted source archives with checksum 082a11742c027ccd908d4b3c2840595e733dd1a7c6f093e05e3b316027d1e105 and 949c772e4a0679f0edd5a7fc846b24b32fa59bca9c3cd26c82d93968cf631409 lead to no difference in source code, just metadata like file timestamps (seems like the source tarball for the RPM was created before the tarball for the release as upstream). I assume the SRPM with the SCL-enabled spec file was a mistake and the separate (non-SCL) spec file is the one to be reviewed (which I did manually, too) - please provide a short clarification here. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2309679 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202309679%23c5 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
