[Bug 2308448] Review Request: rust-rublk - Rust block device in userspace

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2308448



--- Comment #17 from Ming Lei <minlei@xxxxxxxxxx> ---
Hi Fabio,

Thanks for the review!

(In reply to Fabio Valentini from comment #16)
> I'm getting errors when trying to download the files with "fedora-review" ...
> 
> ERROR: 'Error <urlopen error [SSL: CERTIFICATE_VERIFY_FAILED] certificate
> verify failed: unable to get local issuer certificate (_ssl.c:1000)>
> downloading
> https://people.redhat.com/minlei/fedpkg/rublk/rust-rublk-0.2.1-1.fc40.src.
> rpm'
> 
> Is people.redhat.com having issues with its HTTPS certificate?

I don't know, maybe it is one transient issue, can you check it again?

I just try to download the src.rpm from one fresh VM and my android mobile
phone,
not see such issue.

> 
> ========================================
> 
> You have (BSD-2-Clause OR Apache-2.0 OR MIT) in your License tag.
> When doing a local build, I don't get any dependency in the package's
> dependency tree with that license string.
> 
> You will need to check *for every new version* that the summary and license
> tag are still accurate.
> The output of the %cargo_license_summary macro during the build of the
> current version is
> 
> # 0BSD OR MIT OR Apache-2.0
> # Apache-2.0 OR BSL-1.0
> # Apache-2.0 OR MIT
> # Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception OR Apache-2.0 OR MIT
> # BSD-3-Clause
> # GPL-2.0-or-later
> # MIT
> # MIT OR Apache-2.0
> # MIT OR Zlib OR Apache-2.0
> # MPL-2.0+
> # Unlicense OR MIT
> 
> (which is what you should also paste into the spec file above the
> subpackage's License tag, as instructed by the spec generated by rust2rpm)
> 
> ========================================
> 
> Your package also statically links the regex-syntax crate, which has (for
> our standards in Fedora / Red Hat) incomplete license information. It
> bundles code that's  derived from Unicode data, resulting in code covered by
> the Unicode-DFS-2016 license. For the Fedora package, we're fixing this here:
> 
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-regex-syntax/blob/rawhide/f/regex-
> syntax-fix-metadata.diff
> 
> So when building with vendored crates, you will need to add
> "Unicode-DFS-2016" to the license tag manually.

OK, will fix the license tag.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2308448

Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202308448%23c17

-- 
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux