https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2296542 Fabio Valentini <decathorpe@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |decathorpe@xxxxxxxxx CC| |decathorpe@xxxxxxxxx Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flags| |fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from Fabio Valentini <decathorpe@xxxxxxxxx> --- The license situation of this crate seems to be somewhat weird: - crate code is MIT - proto/*.proto files are Apache-2.0, but I can't see that they're actually referenced by the code? - src/generated/types.bin is a weird binary file (where is it from?) and it seems to have an embedded BSD-3-Clause license text 1. Please confirm my suspicions that the Apache-2.0 licensed .proto files are indeed unused. If that is indeed the case, investigate whether they can be dropped from the package and / or from the crate upstream. 2. Determine the origin of the types.bin file. How it's generated? Is that process reproducible? Could we rebuild it at build-time? And why does it embed a BSD-3-Clause license text? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2296542 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202296542%23c3 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
