https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2283539 --- Comment #11 from Sandro <gui1ty@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- Nevermind. I turns out things aren't all that complicated, though a bit tricky nonetheless. It turns out `paraview-data` requires `paraview`. So, `paraview` _and_ `paraview-data` will always be installed for any of the flavors. By extension, I think it is fine to have the plugin require `paraview` as was already the case in the spec file. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2283539 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202283539%23c11 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
